Reflections
From: Wendy FrenchDate: Sun, 13 May 2012 at 12:19pm
David McKee Mon, 14 May
Useful stuff Wendy, both key observations:
1.
1:1 with personal ownership does make a huge difference. It's that
passing of responsibility, for the practicalities of the devices
(charging etc) but also for the potential benefits to extending
learning, in a seamless way, that changes everything. I think for many
of our more reluctant teachers, it's this passing of responsibility that
they feel most uncomfortable with. I've had a several folk say to me
"well, they'll forget to bring it to school, they'll forget to charge
it, they'll do bad things on it etc etc". It's a very negative
perspective of course, and ignores the potentially huge benefits, but
glad to hear your pupils are rising to the challenge. This will be
useful evidence to convince the naysayers!
2.
Workflow on the iPad specifically does worry me. It has always struck
me that you need a robust and well structured online system sitting
behind 1:1 - eg when we ran our 1:1 project in my school in London, our
use of the Fronter MLE mushroomed. It became a/the core tool across the
school. Really the success of 1:1 and a (good!) VLE/MLE are mutually
dependent, IMHO anyway.
And
of course Glow doesn't meet that need right now.
It
has become fashionable of late to say there's no need for a
VLE/MLE/Learning Platform and that we can do all the workflow stuff we
need with existing tools like Dropbox etc, but I don't buy it,
especially for say a large secondary school where teachers see hundreds
of pupils a week. There needs to be a structured way to for teachers to
collect, assess, feedback, store and collate work on an ongoing basis,
and I just don't think email is in any way the answer to that. And
Dropbox and the like are just too flat.
The new Glow will provide us with tools that may take us more in the right direction but I worry about 2 things:
1.
It won't be structured enough (out the box anyway) to meet the need of
large scale digital workflow, particularly in secondary schools.
2. The iPad's particular method of file handling will be difficult to integrate with it.
As
you say, many schools must be managing somehow (Jenni is off to ESSA
Academy tomorrow so we'll see what they do), but personally I still
think we're waiting for the killer app for iPad workflow in schools.
Dave.
Fraser Speirs Mon, 14 May
Hi David, Wendy,
Totally agree that storing documents in email doesn’t scale. Email is a good and reliable transport for small to medium files but the end presentation is poor. One approach that has helped some of our teachers is to set up email filtering into specific mailboxes for each child or class. That’s not intended to solve the storage solution as much as to avoid the inbox being bombed every time a submission comes around.
One of the early changes that we came to appreciate was that pupils will generate a ton of data on their devices (one girl in Andrew’s class is currently toting around 5.5GB of Brushes documents!) and that it’s important to be selective in the things that you personally file.
Secondly, you can trust the device. Data doesn’t often go missing on an iPad (and you have a backup when you sync) so it’s often OK to just check the work on the device and leave it there, knowing that you can get it back if you need it later.
Perhaps this is one of the early results of the pilot: that any modern VLE for use with 1:1 iOS setups has to support document upload via email?
It’s really important to me to gather all the feedback I can on this issue so, if others feel similarly, please add your insights here. I can feed this back into Apple at a very high level and get some attention on it – unfortunately I’m not sufficiently embedded to promise fixes but if we can identify the issues it will be a very valuable outcome.
Best,
Fraser
Totally agree that storing documents in email doesn’t scale. Email is a good and reliable transport for small to medium files but the end presentation is poor. One approach that has helped some of our teachers is to set up email filtering into specific mailboxes for each child or class. That’s not intended to solve the storage solution as much as to avoid the inbox being bombed every time a submission comes around.
One of the early changes that we came to appreciate was that pupils will generate a ton of data on their devices (one girl in Andrew’s class is currently toting around 5.5GB of Brushes documents!) and that it’s important to be selective in the things that you personally file.
Secondly, you can trust the device. Data doesn’t often go missing on an iPad (and you have a backup when you sync) so it’s often OK to just check the work on the device and leave it there, knowing that you can get it back if you need it later.
Perhaps this is one of the early results of the pilot: that any modern VLE for use with 1:1 iOS setups has to support document upload via email?
It’s really important to me to gather all the feedback I can on this issue so, if others feel similarly, please add your insights here. I can feed this back into Apple at a very high level and get some attention on it – unfortunately I’m not sufficiently embedded to promise fixes but if we can identify the issues it will be a very valuable outcome.
Best,
Fraser
Lucy Gallagher Tue, 15 May
We have been full pelt since the inspiring Coatbridge
kick off and the staff have achieved amazing things in a short space of
time. All still motivated, but a dip is to be expected from time to
time. Workflow has caused a bit of a dip for us and
I think we’re all feeling the workload at the moment.
Still enthused but am concerned
about the extra pressure on staff especially when they are completing
personal
learning planning reports for their pupils, on top of everything else
already.
I encouraged Wendy and Fiona to abandon their weekly logs last week –
although I note that both completed them over the weekend. We are
arranging some time out for them - though typically both declined an
offer for Monday because they want to be in class to work with the
children on particular lessons they have both planned. Fiona has
designed a fantastic WikiSpace for Reading Conferencing and VCOP Big
Writing but has been frustrated by the limitations of uploading Pages
docs to it. Wendy has explored myriad solutions and is currently using
Readdledocs. I’m extremely impressed with all that they’ve
achieved.
Fiona Hunter and Jenni Robertson ICT D.O.s called in on
Thursday and it was great to see them. They have given us very useful advice
about workflow and continue to do so. Peter Lennon and Richard Burgess are also
looking into webdav for us. Jim and Jamie, Edinburgh DOs, Connected Flow
and Kevin have been wonderful and I am thrilled that now Basecamp is open we
have begun to have access to help and advice from our partner colleagues too.
John Johnston has been posting really helpful information. We have managed to
get up and running extremely quickly and we recognise that part of the pilot is
trial and error in exploring different solutions for workflow, but not yet
having this finalised is impacting on time management and efficiency, so I hope
we can move forward with all the advice on this and that I can help shoulder some of
the weight.
I agree that a sturdy, flexible VLE is a crucial element for sustainable workflow.
Thanks, all
Lucy
David McKee Tue, 15 May
"that any modern VLE for use with 1:1 iOS setups has to support document upload via email?"
Yeah,
maybe, but I'm not sure if that is only thinking within the paradigm
that the iPad (currently) forces you into. ie utilising email. Consider
this routine scenario:
History
teacher sets tasks for his S3 class, say 1 a week. For each task, each
pupil must submit something - might be written, graphical, video, audio
etc etc.
Teacher needs to
be able to collect this work, comment on it, mark/grade it. Teacher
wants to hold onto this work, and pupil needs to be able to easily
access teacher's comments and grades. Teacher wants an automatic
comment/gradebook to build up over the term that links to each item of
work. The teacher needs to see the whole class's work/comments/grades,
but the pupil should only be able to see their work/comments/grades.
The
teacher would also have multiple, discrete containers where he could do
this for each of his classes. Even better, once the number of tasks set
becomes large, the teacher could collect multiple tasks together into a
folder hierarchy.
It
should be a simple process for the teacher to set a piece of work for
their class. When it was set, pupils would automatically be notified of
this work, including (if desired) a deadline for submission. It would
also be a simple process for pupils to submit work directly into the
appropriate area for the teacher to be able to comment on it and mark it
etc.
What I am describing
here really is standard VLE functionality, using a (non-iPad) client,
and it has been available via decent VLEs (eg Fronter which I used
previously) for years. Not perfect, but in my experience, it worked
pretty well. You might say it is a relatively traditional approach, but
it allowed me to easily work completely digitally with all my classes,
in terms of setting, collecting, recording, assessing and accessing
their work.
Don't get me
wrong - I love my iPad, but we are jumping through some pretty
convoluted (ingenious, but convoluted) hoops to try to carry out
anything like this kind of workflow, as I said before, for 2 reasons:
1.
We don't have a decent VLE in place at a national (or, in our case
anyway, local) level. Not the problem of this pilot, but a national one
that the new Glow will probably not address.
2. Even if/when
we do, the iPad's file management system makes interacting with any kind
of cloud-based system like this pretty difficult.
What
we need is a robust, modern VLE (maybe call it something else since
many folk think of Glow Learn when they hear VLE!). Alongside that, we
need a properly integrated client app that allows full interaction with
this VLE. Maybe this can be done with Moodle, or maybe Studywiz, or
Edmodo? (Or what happened to Powerschool?) I know these systems have iOS
client apps, but can they do what I describe above for both the teacher
and the pupil? Maybe, but I've not seen it.
It
just seems ironic to me that we're struggling to find a seamless way to
do what was possible on good VLEs with a Windows/Mac/Linux client years
ago.
So yes, if there's something that Apple need to hear then it's this - where is this education-focused killer app?!
Or
at a more basic level, just give us an iPad-based File Manager (a local
'eLocker', to pinch a Studywiz term) that is accessible from the
browser. Every app gets a 'Share to eLocker' option, Safari gets access
to the eLocker. Simple. :-)
Who knows, but we're not there yet with a robust method for addressing school's digital workflow needs.
Dave.
Lucy Gallagher Tue, 15 May
Hi Dave
I
was a great fan and supporter of Studywiz (and its eLocker) but jumped
ship to Glow because it seemed a bit of a no-brainer at the time not to
opt for a national and 'free' VLE. Not so sure now... but seems a good
time to capture teacher and pupil needs to inform future provision. What
a good idea to come up with a new name! I have a feeling that the
webDav in Glow I'm trying to get my head around - with lots of help from
John Johnston - might be a plausible eLocker solution, but yes it does
appear circuitous.
Lucy
Fraser Speirs Tue, 15 May
Had another think about this today. David, you’re right that there are two sides to this:
1. iOS currently sucks at uploading arbitrary files to arbitrary web sites over HTTP.
2. Even if iOS was currently good at that, we don’t have any clarity about where or what we’ll be uploading them to come September.
Perhaps if I explain how I and some colleagues do it today, that might be useful.
For distributing work to pupils, we currently use email but will be switching to iTunes U in August. iTunes U allows you to upload lessons, files and other content and have pupils subscribe. When new content appears, their devices get a push notification and assignments and deadlines are shown in a collated view (some explanatory screenshots are here).
What iTunes U doesn’t address is the submission part. Currently I use email and filters for this: pupils’ work will come from their email address into our Google Apps. I have created filters to apply a label to each pupil or class when I receive an email from them that contains an attachment. That makes their emails appear in individual folders on the iPad.
Unless I need the native file format for some reason, I usually ask them to send a PDF or JPEG version of the file depending on the app. When I open their file attachment in Mail, I save it to PDF Expert on my own iPad and use the annotation tools there to mark up the document.
At this point, I have a permanent copy of the pupil’s work on my iPad. PDF Expert can also connect to several types of cloud storage for off-board sharing or storage. It’s also possible to build up a folder hierarchy inside PDF Expert. I will then either print and return the document for feedback or email it back with the annotations embedded in the document.
The major limitation of this system is if the pupil needs to submit a file that’s greater than the 25MB attachment size permitted by Google Apps. In this case, I’ll use PDF Expert’s device-to-device WiFi transfer to move the file – which means I have to do it in school but so be it, for now.
Hope that helps, at least a bit.
1. iOS currently sucks at uploading arbitrary files to arbitrary web sites over HTTP.
2. Even if iOS was currently good at that, we don’t have any clarity about where or what we’ll be uploading them to come September.
Perhaps if I explain how I and some colleagues do it today, that might be useful.
For distributing work to pupils, we currently use email but will be switching to iTunes U in August. iTunes U allows you to upload lessons, files and other content and have pupils subscribe. When new content appears, their devices get a push notification and assignments and deadlines are shown in a collated view (some explanatory screenshots are here).
What iTunes U doesn’t address is the submission part. Currently I use email and filters for this: pupils’ work will come from their email address into our Google Apps. I have created filters to apply a label to each pupil or class when I receive an email from them that contains an attachment. That makes their emails appear in individual folders on the iPad.
Unless I need the native file format for some reason, I usually ask them to send a PDF or JPEG version of the file depending on the app. When I open their file attachment in Mail, I save it to PDF Expert on my own iPad and use the annotation tools there to mark up the document.
At this point, I have a permanent copy of the pupil’s work on my iPad. PDF Expert can also connect to several types of cloud storage for off-board sharing or storage. It’s also possible to build up a folder hierarchy inside PDF Expert. I will then either print and return the document for feedback or email it back with the annotations embedded in the document.
The major limitation of this system is if the pupil needs to submit a file that’s greater than the 25MB attachment size permitted by Google Apps. In this case, I’ll use PDF Expert’s device-to-device WiFi transfer to move the file – which means I have to do it in school but so be it, for now.
Hope that helps, at least a bit.
Lucy Gallagher Wed, 16 May
Hi Fraser
Lots
of interesting, useful ideas here. While we're interested in longterm
solutions what we really need now is a simple, easy to manage system to
see us through until the end of term. Come September we'll all have to
look anew but an interim workable workflow solution is most pressing for
us. I'm away for the holiday weekend and the teachers are also time
poor, particularly because they're working on PLPs, but will try and get
something in place that takes up a lot less of their time.
We really appreciate this community and highly value the opportunity it presents not only to share ideas but also workload.
Lucy
David McKee Wed, 16 May
Hi Fraser,
That's
sounds interesting, particularly the iTunesU bit, although as you say
that a 1 way rather than 2 way process. Obviously there are lots of
great tools out there, and innovative teachers will always find ways to
do what they need to do, in the short term with these pilots anyway.
(I'd be interested to hear about how large secondaries are managing
workflow too though as I think scale presents a whole new set of
challenges. What does a teacher who sees 200 pupils in a week do? What
are the Bellshill guys doing? )
I'm
interested really though in thinking about the longer term, in terms of
an approach that is easily understandable and useable by your average
teacher, beyond pilots and early adopters like we all are. I think if
we're going to really embed 1:1 in the day to day activities of 'normal' teachers, we'll need something more structured.
VLEs
seem to be thought of as a bit passé these days, but actually (IMHO
anyway) their mass adoption failed because they came too soon. Really
1:1 is the lever for real success with a VLE, and vice versa. But what
we need is a VLE that works seamlessly with iOS. Are any 1:1 schools
(Mac-based as well as iPad based) in the US using VLEs successfully? I
suspect we're only really having this debate because iPad integration
with existing VLEs is troublesome.
Anyway,
enjoying this discussion, and there's no quick and easy answer I don't
think, but if anyone is putting pressure on anyone that has any sway
anywhere(!), I think this is the missing link with iPad in schools. Folk
are having success with iPad despite this missing link, but
with a fit for purpose education-focused solution, we'll find it much
easier to move 1:1 into the mainstream for everyone.
Dave.
Fraser Speirs Wed, 16 May
Relevant to this discussion, I received this link from a
friend who is an Apple Consulting Engineer in the US. Here’s a detailed
writeup of various approaches taken, abandoned and settled on in the
Chicago Public Schools iPad deployments:
http://ipadsincps.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ipad-file-management-solution.html
David, I totally agree with you in your comments on VLEs. I would also say that the was probably too much initial focus on replicating things like email and calendaring, and other services done cheaper and better elsewhere.
I note that Fronter now have a basic iOS app available too.
http://ipadsincps.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ipad-file-management-solution.html
David, I totally agree with you in your comments on VLEs. I would also say that the was probably too much initial focus on replicating things like email and calendaring, and other services done cheaper and better elsewhere.
I note that Fronter now have a basic iOS app available too.
David McKee Fri, 18 May
That looks really really nice. I like that it's an education focused solution and has integration with AD.
One
thing though - I've only looked at it for 10 mins but it looks like you
can only submit work in the form of photos or videos from the iPad. If
you watch the video you'll see the bit where they submit work, they do
it from a Mac. What if it's text, or indeed any iWork document? That's
quite an important thing obviously.
Definitely worth looking at it further though I'd say. Is this Studywiz with a different badge?
Dave.
Lucy Gallagher Fri, 25 May
School eLockers looks like it does have the hand of lovely Geoff from Studywiz upon it
Studywiz
is a great tool and was silk compared to Glow cotton. I still feel
guilty about changing my allegiance from Studywiz to Glow but at the
time I did, like others, believe Edinburgh would be out of sync with the
rest of Scotland and incur an unnecessary additional cost. The way
things have panned out I'm not so sure now. It would be great to see a
demo - if Geoff is still talking to us!
No comments:
Post a Comment